Talk:14th Congress of the Philippines

Untitled
Are the results of the constituency elections official? Any chance of getting a list of representatives per party? (I'd compile it, but some of them have more than one party listed.) &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 11:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Not exactly but people elected under the Liberal Party (Atienza Wing) have no party unless they were under a national/regional party allied to the Lakas or KAMPI Party like the Padajon Surigao, SARRO, Kilusang Diwa ng Taguig and the BALANE Rizalninoynapoleon 10:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Could someone correct and fill in the sectoral representatives table? — Nightstallion 11:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, did it myself; the representatives themselves, however, weren't listed on the EC homepage... — Nightstallion 20:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Juan Miguel Zubiri
According to this link, the COMELEC says Zubiri was nominated by Lakas-CMD. I don't even think the COMELEC recognizes TEAM Unity, after all, it's not a political party, but a coalition. -- Howard  the   Duck  09:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Majority and minority bloc
It should not be included since its not permanent. Besides the members of the Senate should just say the name of the Senators, Party affiliation, and their terms as Senators. Rizalninoynapoleon 14:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

For example this table from the 12th Congress:

Senate

 * Political affiliation at the beginning of Congress.
 * Elected on May 14, 2001, to serve until June 30, 2004 to complete the unexpired term of Teofisto Guingona who was appointed Vice President in 2001.
 * Appointed Foreign Secretary in 2003.
 * Died in 2003.


 * If there's a new senate president, then there'll be a new vote, hence new majority and minority blocs, hence new edits, hence it's really not permanent. And not everything that was done on other congresses will be done here; there were no partylists before. And if anyone can come up on how the senators voted on the senate president election the better, since it is important to see which senators belong to the majority and minority bloc especially in the multiparty system RP has. If RP has a 2-party system we wouldn't need a majority bloc column since it'll be pretty straightforward. -- Howard  the   Duck  16:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Unless someone comes up a better reason, I shall be removing the NPIV notice and restoring the bloc column shortly. -- Howard  the   Duck  07:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Seeing no one has offered rebuttals and other opinions, I'll commence readding them and remove the NPOV message. -- Howard  the   Duck  16:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No way. This issue is not resolved yet. Besides, I look at the pages of the U.S. Senate and there is does not say who is in the majority or minority bloc. Rizalninoynapoleon 06:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not for grouping them into majority of minority blocks, there's no need for that, their political parties should at least show their CURRENT PARTY AFFILIATION, not whether they are with the administration or with the opposition. And polarization of the Congress can't be clearly defined, they sway overnight. The vote for the senate presidency isn't sufficient to establish a senator's pro-administration, anti-admin stance, they don't correspond to their membership to the majority or minority. --Scorpion prinz (Talk 06:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The table isn't saying who's the admininistration or opposition, it's saying who's at the majority and who's at the minority. The words "majority/minority bloc" are tossed around everyday and it is vital to define who belongs to those.
 * And you won't need that in the US Congress (or any other two-party system in that matter) since it is certainly clearcut, the blues (and one indy in the House) are the majority while the reds are the minority.
 * Also, if you'd notice, the LP and NP never voted on the same page. -- Howard  the   Duck  11:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Does anyone else wants to say something? If there's no objection I'll reinstate them. -- Howard  the   Duck  15:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No way this is not resolved yet do put it yet until there is an agreement Rizalninoynapoleon 16:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * How can there'd be an agreement when there are no arguments issued? You can't just filibuster this. -- Howard  the   Duck  16:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Reindent: Unless there is an argument, I'll reinstate this, since no argument=agreement. Filibustering is bad. -- Howard  the   Duck  03:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Here is my compromise, no putting of who is in the majority/minority bloc since their party affiliation will be enough and follow the examples from the 10th to the 13th Congresses. Rizalninoynapoleon 01:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You call that a compromise when only your system is included? LOL. Tell why it isn't a bad thing to add the majority and minority bloc in a multi-party system. -- Howard  the   Duck  03:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It's been half a month, and there's still no reply. If no one comes up with a reasonable argument I'll do it myself and remove POV-check. -- Howard  the   Duck  08:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It's Christmas already... unless there's a compelling argument I'll be doing it when Simbang Gabi comes along. -- Howard  the   Duck  13:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This issue has grown stale. There is no dispute, and honestly, the info is outdated by now anyway, so I am removing the tag.  D   rew   S    mith 02:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.senate.gov.ph/senators/senlist.htm
 * In Floor leaders of the Senate of the Philippines on 2011-03-19 08:16:15, 404 Not Found
 * In 10th Congress of the Philippines on 2011-05-23 02:09:09, 404 Not Found
 * In 14th Congress of the Philippines on 2011-05-23 03:30:07, 404 Not Found
 * In 1st Congress of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on 2011-05-25 06:52:24, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
 * In 10th Congress of the Philippines on 2011-06-01 01:50:36, 404 Not Found
 * In 11th Congress of the Philippines on 2011-06-01 03:06:51, 404 Not Found
 * In 12th Congress of the Philippines on 2011-06-01 14:22:33, 404 Not Found
 * In 14th Congress of the Philippines on 2011-06-01 15:56:12, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on 14th Congress of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090317081729/http://www.gmanews.tv/story/70703/Its-over-says-Barias-of-hotel-standoff to http://www.gmanews.tv/story/70703/Its-over-says-Barias-of-hotel-standoff
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080812160751/https://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20080812-154032/Arroyo-resurrects-Charter-change to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20080812-154032/Arroyo-resurrects-Charter-change
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610071950/https://www.sunstar.com.ph:80/static/cag/2008/06/09/news/misamis.oriental.grieves.over.lawmaker.s.death.html to http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/cag/2008/06/09/news/misamis.oriental.grieves.over.lawmaker.s.death.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.senate.gov.ph/senators/senlist.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 14th Congress of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080117031804/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=100700 to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=100700
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090402020935/http://www.inquirer.net/specialreports/spratlys/view.php?db=1&article=20080307-123244 to http://www.inquirer.net/specialreports/spratlys/view.php?db=1&article=20080307-123244
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140527115514/http://www.senate.gov.ph/ to http://www.senate.gov.ph/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)