Talk:1866 Georgia State Freedmen's Conventions

Peer Group G peer review (Michael Healy)
Your lead is solid. I don't think it needs much improvement. The only suggestion would be to include hyperlinks to other wikipedia articles for people like Lincoln and the other leaders of the convention if they have pages. The overall structure is done well. I think it was a good idea to split the two conventions on different dates into their own sections for clarity. The tone is sufficiently neutral. I didn't get in indication of bias, just a straightforward explanation of what occurred at the conventions. The only real suggestions I would have is to add hyperlinks to things throughout the article. You reference Robert's Rules of Order which I had to look up because I wasn't sure what it was. It has a wiki page so you could link to that and do the same for anyone in the article you mention that has a wiki page. Also you only use your references one time each. You could use those more than once, like in the "Overview" section when you mention the date of the convention you could cite the minutes of the proceedings. Healym24 (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

C. H. Prince and Thomas P. Beard
This entry says "C. H. Prince and Thomas P. Beard also seem to disappear in history after the meetings." Charles H. Prince and Thomas P. Beard both seem to have gone on to prominence. I tagged the unsourced statement as dubious. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)