Talk:1935 Atlantic hurricane season

Stub?
I personally don't believe this is a stub anymore, as all the storm accounts are there and I added in details for the individual storms. I believe this article is closer to start class overall. Anyone else concur? CapeVerdeWave 19:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Agreed, I raised it to start. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Very close to B-class IMO. CrazyC83 02:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Not quite, it needs more sources. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * That's correct and it needs the line references. CrazyC83 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:N041535.jpg
The image File:N041535.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --13:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?
The article says that the yankee hurricane's highest windswere 80 mph in the article (Cat.1),but it also stated that it peaked as an 105 Mph Hurricane(Cat.2 strength)in the info box.I'm not a user(sorry!) so I can't change the info in the box,so can someone change the info from Category 2 to Category 1? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.224.179 (talk) 00:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The 105 mph max strength is from HURDAT. The 75 mph figure is from the older Monthly Weather Review article that mentions an observed measurement, probably from the "downtown office" that is likely a few miles south. I made adjustments that reflect the HURDAT data but this section could use a more thorough review.