Talk:1999 Indian general election

The party name should be on the list not the English translation of party meaning.
Stop adding translation of party menaing in the list. The party name should be on the list not the English translation of party meaning. I dont know who added this nonsense, I have removed it please dont put back again. --106.51.98.117 (talk) 13:35, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Indian general election, 1999. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080604152951/http://www.asiasociety.org:80/publications/indian_elections.13.a.html to http://www.asiasociety.org/publications/indian_elections.13.a.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061001152855/http://www.asiasociety.org/publications/indian_elections.13.app2.html to http://www.asiasociety.org/publications/indian_elections.13.app2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Indian general election, 1999. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081207201816/http://www.eci.gov.in:80/ to http://www.eci.gov.in/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183222/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

CPI(M) in infobox
Happyjit Singh, CPI(M) shouldn't be added in this page because it didn't get even 10% seats, nor was it a coalition partner or anything. INC is added in 2014 and 2019 because it's the main opposition and something has to be there. Ok123l (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That's a very arbitrary argument. There is no 10% threshold, no requirement to have coalition partner etc. Also, there is no reason to limit to 3 parties in the infobox, there are plenty of cases with far more parties featured. In this case BJP and INC won only slightly more than 50% of the total vote combined, so it is clearly warranted to feature other parties. --Soman (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)