Talk:2006 Women's Intercontinental Cup

Copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --SFB 12:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Brackets
Looks pretty good after the last revision. I'm not sure I agree with the three playoff brackets being removed, though. -- ArglebargleIV 13:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I decided to add the crosstables for each of the pools back -- it's a nice summary of the pool results. -- ArglebargleIV 17:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The team members are now available through hidden sections. -- ArglebargleIV 18:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Possible playoff bracket templates
These are the two possible playoff brackets that can be included in this (and other qualifier) pages.

This is the (simpler) bracket currently used in the 2006 World Cup article :

This is a bracket that I modified from another one. It has the same information, but is a more compact, and clearly lists the pool positions that the teams came from.

This one also has the advantage that it has enough parameters so that it can be used for other brackets than the top-level -- it is easily used for the fifth-through-eighth and ninth-through-twelfth playoffs as well :


 * I prefer for simple one, because not confusing anyway, and easy. Cheers --Aleen f 1 02:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah. but the simple one can't be used for the 5th-8th and 9th-12th sections, though, it is hardcoded for first through fourth only. -- ArglebargleIV 05:00, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Here it is: