Talk:2007–08 Football Conference

Football: English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conference North and Conference South 2007-08[edit]

I suggest we add a section to keep track of the regional divisions of North and South, and change the article name to Football Conference 2007-08, this would be similar to the seasonal articles on the football league, which look at the championship, FL1 and FL2 all on one page. Funkyduncan 09:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to revive this idea. Does anyone have any complaints? (I'm also thinking about getting the 08-09 article going, while we're on the subject :) ) Falastur2 (talk) 22:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boston United[edit]

What's going on with that? I have a user telling me that they have been relegated to Conference North, and Altrincham has been allowed to stay in the Conference National. However, I can't find any sources online that say that. Can anyone show me a source? Che84 18:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source found, page updated. Alexrushfear 11:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

As you may or may not be aware, the Premiership and Football League articles have been updated in the last few weeks with a new templated table code which makes it much easier to edit the table, as well as being of a more uniform size. The table calculates both points total and goal difference itself, thus saving time and effort, and contains a whole lot less clutter - no more <center> code needed, no more masses of ||'s between lines with no clear indication of what number goes where, etc. It would also bring this article in line with the other articles of this nature - not only for English leagues, but a number of other leagues from other countries, too. If you want to see the kind of look the table will have, and the code for it, just check out this page, among others. Chances are you've seen it and perhaps editted it already...

Does anyone have any objections to this going ahead? (supposing we can get a code written for this league). I thought it best to ask, since changing format has been a controversial topic recently, though this style of table seems to have achieved consensus lately. Falastur2 14:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've created an updated table using the templates as described above. The proposal is here. glennb28 t • c 11:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After one week since the discussion started, there have been no disagreements. I will update the proposed table after tonight's Droylsden/Oxford game. glennb28 t • c 17:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've swapped them around. The old-style table is now here, just in case! glennb28 t • c 10:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.footballconference.co.uk/
- In 1997–98 Football Conference on 2011-06-08 21:21:27, HTTP Redirect Loop: [1] -> [2] -> [3]
- In 1998–99 Football Conference on 2011-06-08 22:51:22, HTTP Redirect Loop: [4] -> [5] -> [6]
- In 1999–2000 Football Conference on 2011-06-09 02:52:32, HTTP Redirect Loop: [7] -> [8] -> [9]
- In 2000–01 Football Conference on 2011-06-10 06:42:07, HTTP Redirect Loop: [10] -> [11] -> [12]
- In 2001–02 Football Conference on 2011-06-10 08:33:05, HTTP Redirect Loop: [13] -> [14] -> [15]
- In 2002–03 Football Conference on 2011-06-11 05:21:23, HTTP Redirect Loop: [16] -> [17] -> [18]
- In 2003–04 Football Conference on 2011-06-11 07:26:25, HTTP Redirect Loop: [19] -> [20] -> [21]
- In 2006–07 Football Conference on 2011-06-14 23:10:12, HTTP Redirect Loop: [22] -> [23] -> [24]
- In 2007–08 Football Conference on 2011-06-15 23:19:48, HTTP Redirect Loop: [25] -> [26] -> [27]

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.footballconference.co.uk/News/FC_Story_Page/0,14288,5886_2792606,00.html
- In 2007–08 Aldershot Town F.C. season on 2011-05-27 02:10:38, 404 Not Found
- In 2007–08 Aldershot Town F.C. season on 2011-05-27 15:33:28, 404 Not Found
- In 2007–08 Aldershot Town F.C. season on 2011-06-15 22:33:44, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]