Talk:2010 East Asian Football Championship

Roll back
I rolled back a whole heap of edits, mainly because it was easier than going through them individually. But, the main reason is that they were poorly thoght out and were a case of trying to fit the page into some "standard" which is not appropriate. First, very few of these players have pages, so linking all the names regardless is silly. Second, the "last names only" thing is silly as well - mainly because in at least one case it actually obscured who the goal scorer was (at least two Subhktars have played for Mongolia recently, so how we are meant to know which one scored is a mystery without a first name) and the rule was applied rather inconsistently as well. There appeared to be some referees names added int there as well - and I apologise for deleting that relevant information. Jlsa (talk) 12:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't think so, it can easy for other user to create a new page. Hoising (talk) 00:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Tie-breaking criteria?
What are the tie-breaking criteria used for this competition? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schnapper (talk • contribs) 12:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Past tournaments seem to use GD first (see 2005 2nd/3rd place) Jlsa (talk) 12:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. Would be interesting to know what AFC/EAFF will declare if both China and Japan win or draw their last game with the same result... Schnapper (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Reports
The report by JFA is not only for multiple language. Since the JFA is organizing association and EAFF is the host. Two versions are different references for the match, but reports official. Hoising (talk) 05:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No they are EAFF documents. The Japanese one is released through the Japanese Federation becuase people IN JAPAN (ie, reading jp.wikipedia or whatever) would probably prefer the report written in Japanese. Jlsa (talk) 05:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. Why you can said that two documents were sent by two different organizations are same? The matter are the same in first match, but the documents can be different. We should respect these two independent organizations. Hoising (talk)