Talk:2011 Wisconsin Act 10

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on 2011 Wisconsin Act 10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/17/wisconsin-protests-scott-walker-police_n_824697.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715005517/http://shorewood.patch.com:80/articles/high-court-reinstates-controversial-budget-repair-bill to http://shorewood.patch.com/articles/high-court-reinstates-controversial-budget-repair-bill
 * Added tag to http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mlib/3627/09/3627_1315337593.pdf
 * Added tag to http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mlib/3627/09/3627_1315423000.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120909024439/http://budget.wisc.edu/new-badger-partnership-executive-summary/ to http://budget.wisc.edu/new-badger-partnership-executive-summary

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Effective date
The lede states that the law went into effect on June 29, 2011. No source is provided, and this date is not mentioned in the body of the article. I have tagged the sentence in the lede regarding the effective date; it needs a source. I have not been able to find one. SunCrow (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Neutrality
The intro only states Walker's explanation. Perhaps the part about separating the collective bargaining part from the budget, which indicates it was never about the budget, should be included in the introduction? 2600:1700:B270:20F0:29A4:B235:E1A5:2004 (talk) 01:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)