Talk:2013 International Women's Club Championship

Football: Women's football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women's sport: WOSO Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Order of goalscorers[edit]

Hi,

originally I ordered the goalscorers by time scored. Now I see that Kante4 reordered them alphabetically by nationality. The question is which do we want. I think national isn't really the right option because it is a game between clubs not national teams. maybe order by club (add in brackets or something). or maybe completely change the format and put it in a table?

--SuperJew (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Time is surely not right. Either by nation like we did at international tournaments or by name. Have nothing against a table but that question remains. So, name or nationality? Kante4 (talk) 14:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think nationality isn't right, as the tournament is not between nations. for example we have 2 nationalities (England and Japan) with 3 goalscorers each, but they are from different clubs. probably clubs would be the best and to move it to a table. any more opinions? Koppapa, CyMoahk2? --SuperJew (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just going on nationality certainly isn't correct for a club competition. Neither is timing. In fact, since it's a club competition, the format they're currently listed in isn't sufficient. I think they should be changed to reflect these: 2012 FIFA Club World Cup#Goalscorers ; 2011–12 UEFA Champions League#Statistics The order is by name, though nationality is "shown" first; club name and nationality also should be included. CyMoahk2 (talk) 15:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My derp: order is by club name first and foremost. CyMoahk2 (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, I'm not awake... THose two tables I pointed out don't even use the same ordering scheme. Oh well, I say we need a table whatever the ordering scheme - player name, club name, or minutes played. (Probably not the latter for such a small competition). CyMoahk2 (talk) 15:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I chose the FIFA Club World Cup format, as I agree with you about minutes played being less relevant in such a small competition, and also the purpose of the mobcast Cup is to be a women's alternative to the FIFA Club World Cup no? --SuperJew (talk) 16:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ordering them by club seems best. Thanks. -Koppapa (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prize money[edit]

Anything known about the prize structure this year? -Koppapa (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2013 International Women's Club Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]