Talk:2017 vote of no confidence in the government of Mariano Rajoy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: AnonymousPurpose (talk · contribs)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

With respect to the good article criteria, I believe this article has an amazing handling on all of it's requirements.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Awesome work on the structure and grammar, it helps hold the whole article together!
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Great reference section, very well versed from all aspects of the situation. Along with the information being reliable it is also verifiable quite easily.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The editors of this article did a great job elaborating on all topics to have the best interest possible.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * I deeply appreciate the attention to detail to include politics in this but not let it effect the argument and where the article stands.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * From what I've seen, almost all of the work done was completely organized and efficient.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All of the images and media used is properly captioned and looks to be sourced properly.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Amazing work! So happy to see such a quality article on Wikipedia that fairly covers everything.

07:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)