Talk:2022 Alaska House of Representatives election

Not sure how to treat the primaries with the new election regime
For districts with four or less candidates, do we treat them all as having "won" the primary and slot them in the general election box? Do we skip a general election box for now? For unopposed candidates, do we show them as having won overall? Technically write-ins could carry the day even though that's unlikely. you've been very active editing this page, what do you think?  Nevermore27  (talk) 03:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Candidates have until July 25th to withdraw, so it's probably best to wait at least until then to go forth with general election stuff. Write-in wins are unlikely, but candidates can apply until November 3rd, so candidates who are currently unopposed could technically end up losing the GE. JenningsTheCrow (talk) 00:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's June 25. And yeah, anything other than reflecting results as they're reported by recognized sources is original research.  There's no rush.
 * Nevermore brought up a greater concern. I moved to North Carolina last year and voted in my first election several weeks ago, the state/county primary (the city general election was held in November, but I had moved out of city limits by then).  I voted the Republican ballot and was puzzled when I didn't see a candidate for sheriff.  Come to find out, when a candidate is unopposed, they cancel the primary election and the candidate advances directly to the general election.  Guess what?  That isn't the case in Alaska, either prior to BM2 or now.  I read encyclopedia entries on Alaska elections and results for unopposed primaries are missing.  Those results are canvassed, tabulated and reported by the Alaska Division of Elections, and subsequently reported by third-party reliable sources.  That's the standard we should be applying.  It sounds like we have Wikipedians who believe that we should impose the standards of another state onto these articles in order to satisfy some false notion of consistency. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  06:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I fail to see what any of that has to do with this discussion.  Nevermore27  (talk) 02:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Typically, with top-two primaries (for example), the two advancing candidates are shown in bold as being the winners of the primary only. As it's top-four, therefore all those who advance should be shown as primary winners. For the general elections, the assumption in uncontested seats is usually not made for the winner because of, however unlikely, situations that lead to another person winning (e.g. write-in who wasn't on the ballot). However, since it's a new system, I'm not sure if there is a write-in option, which would make a default winner reasonable; it's generally inappropriate to assert other possibilities, such as death, withdrawal or disqualification because those are far more circumstantial and speculative. -- Bacon Noodles  (talk • contribs • uploads) 04:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

References?
As far as I can tell, the quantitative results in this article are unreferenced. Should they be removed until references are available? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I just added a citation for the primary results. It wasn't hard to find. OutlawRun (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank! Thing is, the numbers in the article don't match the reference you've provided at all. Seems easiest just to delete everything, since the numbers can't be verified. -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:28, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * you placed many of these results, but didn't provide a reference. Are you able to fix them, or provide a link to the reference you used? Meanwhile, I've marked the article for disputed accuracy and marked the reference that placed with fv because it looks like this article is completely bogus. The numbers don't match, and some races are even reported to the wrong winner. -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * File.louise.stutes.jpg

Caucus vs. Party
Currently, there are points where a candidate's party is listed as "Coalition Republican", "Republican" or "Independent Republican". I'm afraid this may give some readers the false impression that these are separate parties, when they actually members of the same party with different caucus affiliations. I think this information about the caucuses is valuable to include, but may be difficult to clearly present. I welcome any ideas. 71.162.7.170 (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)