Talk:219 Days

Umm, confoosed
Why is the official site considered an unreliable source? Bigdottawa 06:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you believe everything you read? I would hope not.  That's why Wikipedia has verifiability and reliable sources policies in place.  Without these policies, we'd have a boat load of "#1 (pick your genre) group in in the world!" articles.  Put it another way, would you want to read an article about Michael Jackson that used only Michael Jackson's website as its source?  Rklawton 22:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The web site was used to get a track listing. There is no part of the article that has any hint of "#1 (pick your genre) group in in the world!" to it.  What kind of sources are possibly needed for a album article?  Bigdottawa 10:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 219 Days. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122124032/http://cria.ca/gold/0105_g.php to http://www.cria.ca/gold/0105_g.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)