Talk:2nd Flak Division

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I reviewed your article and determined notability. I found other sources which are accessible like this. Thank you for writing articles.

Lightburst (talk) 19:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Lightburst Thank you for your reply. The book you link is the second volume of a multi-part series whose first volume is quoted in the article. Considering the series is ordered by ordinal numbers, and that the unit in question has the ordinal number "2nd" (rather than 291st or above), I doubt that the second volume of the book will be particularly enlightening for the purpose of the article. That said, I'd be glad to correct an oversight. Ted52 (talk) 20:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)