Talk:33 Polyhymnia

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.psi.edu/pds/archive/lc.html
 * In 108 Hecuba on 2011-05-23 02:06:07, 404 Not Found
 * In 190 Ismene on 2011-05-25 02:39:36, 404 Not Found
 * In 196 Philomela on 2011-05-25 04:06:52, 404 Not Found
 * In 198 Ampella on 2011-05-25 05:50:35, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
 * In 108 Hecuba on 2011-05-31 22:16:42, 404 Not Found
 * In 141 Lumen on 2011-06-01 15:27:12, 404 Not Found
 * In 159 Aemilia on 2011-06-01 18:17:44, 404 Not Found
 * In 190 Ismene on 2011-06-04 15:08:38, 404 Not Found
 * In 194 Prokne on 2011-06-04 17:23:24, 404 Not Found
 * In 196 Philomela on 2011-06-06 14:26:48, 404 Not Found
 * In 197 Arete on 2011-06-07 01:38:43, 404 Not Found
 * In 200 Dynamene on 2011-06-18 11:47:45, 404 Not Found
 * In 201 Penelope on 2011-06-19 05:13:00, 404 Not Found
 * In 32 Pomona on 2011-06-19 06:34:45, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on 33 Polyhymnia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5PqnLpqTT?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcfa-www.harvard.edu%2Fiau%2Flists%2FSizes.html to http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/Sizes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 33 Polyhymnia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415134055/http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/20186/1/98-1067.pdf to http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/20186/1/98-1067.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Density
An article in European Physical Journal Plus, link to aritcle, apparently suggests the density is real, and due to elements with atmoic numbers like Z=165. Sounds pretty insane, and certqinly speculative, but might lead to a modification to this sentence from the article:
 * Such a high density is unphysical, so this mass and density estimate of Polyhymnia is considered unreliable by Carry in his study.

Of course, it remains true that the source cited said whart it said, but do we need to say "unphysical" (and what does that mean)? Nø (talk) 11:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The physics paper is referenced in October 19, 2023 USA Today. They say "Polyhymnia may be composed of superheavy elements previously unknown to humans. In other words, it contains elements not on the periodic table at all." ☆ Bri (talk) 23:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Considering the buzz around editing the mass and density section of this article, the multiple news articles (USA Today, Phys.org, ScienceAlert, etc.) on the subject, it would be appropriate to list this publication in the reference section of the article and include a line or two discussing it. The minor planets mailing list which is now added was spurred by this article's existence, so it's really an oversight at this point. However, I know the authors (LaForge et. al.) personally so I'm unsure if it would be appropriate for me to make the edits. Any guidance from more experienced Wikipedians would be appreciated. - Andrew S. CosmologicalDefect (talk) 08:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)