Talk:355th Wing

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move page as requested at this time. If some further evidence arises regarding how this unit is referred to in sources, then we can always move the page then. For now, we haven't got a case for a move, based on comments below. - GTBacchus(talk) 23:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

355th Fighter Wing → 355th Wing — Correct designation of unit. Bwmoll3 (talk) 02:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.



Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

Ref: AFHRA 355th Wing


 * Comment If we're being "correct" about it, then it'd be 355 Wing, wouldn't it? Regardless, though, we should go with what reliable sources call it, not with any official designation.  Powers T 12:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment This page 4th Fighter Wing references them as the "335th fighter wing."Sabre ball (talk) 14:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.