Talk:3D modeling software

I added GMax and trueSpace to this article, as they are both equally as valid as any of the other cited programs, and are both articles in Wikipedia.

Poser isn't a modelling program.
Although Poser does have very primitive tools for changing a model, via magnets, it is not in a true sense a modelling program. I'd advise it be taken out of the list.

Move to '3D modeling software'?
This page would be more clear if it were titled '3D modeling software', or '3D modeling program' and 3D modeler either redirected to it or was a disambig. I suggest this change to avoid confusion with the 3D modeler (person), and because related pages are described as 3D animation program(s) or 3d modeling software (maya), rather than 3d modelers, which seems to be less common usage. wgh 15:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC) dialectric.


 * Sounds like a good idea to me. &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 17:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Merge or Disambiguate: This article doesn't say anything more about the title of a professional who uses the software to produce 3D models. Anything said about that title should be part of the 3D modeling article anyway. Everything else should be part of the 3D computer graphics software article. The only reason I can see to keep this page would be to disambiguate and direct readers to one of the two pages mentioned above. Oicumayberight 16:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Linkfarm
The number of external links to non-notable software is in violation of WP:NOT. I'm removing the external links. --Ronz 19:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)