Talk:4-Hydroxy-TEMPO

How can a chemical that has over 2200 cites on pubmed med and is of significant research and medical use (including several clinical trials) be of "low importance". Something is wrong here.

www.tempol.info as cite
I reverted recent change. Read all about wikisources, etc. Difficult to see how www.tempol.info, essentially an annotated compilation of published work on this drug (which the other editor may be unaware of) in major journals,  can be excluded.

Whole divisions at (e.g.) the NCI have spent the last decade or two working on Tempol. The current page seriously shortchanges all this work among others-- last cite to Tempols pharmacological properties nearly a decade old.. Don't intend to get into an edit battle here. But would appreciate a better outline about why the cite is not appropriate. Or perhaps the other editor would like to follow up and improve the page on his own.