Talk:5G misinformation

Chip implants
Engineers at Columbia University have demonstrated an extreme version of this technology, developing the smallest single-chip system ever created, which could be implanted with a hypodermic needle to measure temperature inside the body, and possibly much more. -World's smallest single-chip system can be injected into the body By Nick Lavars May 11, 2021 https://newatlas.com/electronics/worlds-smallest-single-chip-system-injectable/ 164.100.212.55 (talk) 11:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Are you suggesting we add something about this to the article, or? I'm not sure I understand what you meant by adding this comment. Endwise (talk) 13:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * In this Wikipedia article, this paragraph exists under Section: Government and industrial surveillance
 * "COVID-19 is a cover to embed microchips within COVID-19 vaccine for controlling people via 5G: It is not possible to inject a microchip through a syringe. A microchip has a much larger size than the bore of a needle. It would require a syringe that is about 13 times larger than the one used now to incorporate the size of a microchip. Additionally, it is not possible to make the microchip work without a power source."
 * But in the link I provided, the article says that a chip-system can be injected into the human body, using a hypodermic needle.
 * "Engineers at Columbia University have demonstrated an extreme version of this technology, developing the smallest single-chip system ever created, which could be implanted with a hypodermic needle to measure temperature inside the body, and possibly much more."

(-World's smallest single-chip system can be injected into the body By Nick Lavars May 11, 2021.)
 * It appears to be contradictory. How can this be reconciled?

-164.100.212.55 (talk) 09:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I see the problem, thanks. I think the two sources are reconcilable, but the writing in our article was sloppy. The scientists quoted in the CNBC article seem to be saying that a microchip that can track you can't be made small enough: “That’s just not possible as far as the size that would be required for that microchip... “The individual subcomponents in very, very small chips are small enough, but they need to be attached to everything else that makes them work, that makes them into a device and not just a random floating RFID tag.... I'll update the wording in the article. Thanks! Endwise (talk) 06:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 3 September 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved boldly. The page was moved boldly by the requester. (Note that this does not create a new consensus for the title, assuming any editor objects within a reasonable time.) (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 00:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Misinformation related to 5G technology → 5G misinformation – Concise without sacrificing any meaning. COVID-19 misinformation is not called Misinformation about COVID-19, and 9/11 conspiracy theories is not called Misinformation and rumors about the September 11, 2001 attacks. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk &#124; edits) Feel free to ping me! 22:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"5G conspiracy theories in Maryland" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=5G_conspiracy_theories_in_Maryland&redirect=no 5G conspiracy theories in Maryland] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk &#124; edits) Feel free to ping me! 17:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

"5G misinformation in Maryland" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=5G_misinformation_in_Maryland&redirect=no 5G misinformation in Maryland] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk &#124; edits) Feel free to ping me! 17:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

"5G pseudoscience in Maryland" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=5G_pseudoscience_in_Maryland&redirect=no 5G pseudoscience in Maryland] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk &#124; edits) Feel free to ping me! 17:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Stop using information that is clearly made by 5G supporters
I'm not trying to be a conspiracy theorist here, but I am very skeptical of any pro-5G research and "facts", as they are usually made by government organizations and/or pro-5G individuals, both of whom have been known to lie sometimes.

As a result, I suggest that any information that is distinctly pro-5G be removed from this article, unless they are quotes from pro-5G people.

I am considering submitting this article for deletion. GrinningIodize (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello GrinningIodize, if you want to nominate this article for deletion, the page is here. I wish you good luck. If you want to remove some information from the article, make sure to make requests about specific text to be removed. Nobody is going to care about vague statements like the one you made above. And of course provide clear reasons why it should be removed. "[government organizations] have been known to lie sometimes" is of course, not a valid reason. --McSly (talk) 03:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)