Talk:6th King Edward's Own Cavalry

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

6th Prince of Wales& → 6th King Edward’s Own Cavalry – The new name is the last name this regiment was known by which is even mentioned in the article. This link shows the correct name etc. Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose. No evidence supporting the move in terms of WP:AT. The article is so stubby that a move is at least premature. See also WP:official names if the policy at WP:AT needs explanation. Andrewa (talk) 15:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think the evidence is that the vast majority of article links point to the 6th King Edward’s Own Cavalry and not the 6th Prince of Wales.Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.