Talk:98th (Prince of Wales's) Regiment of Foot

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force

Untitled[edit]

Page to create the missing link in the history of the Staffordshire Regiment Nthep (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Improvements[edit]

I have completed the B class checklist and believe that the article could be improved by addressing the following:

in line citations: at least one per paragraph for a successful B class review;
adding a notes (for Reflist/citations) and see also section;
providing the full bibliographic details of the book listed in references;
adding an image if possible;
cleaning up the text as at the moment there are a lot of small one or two sentence paragraphs that could be combined thematically to make the article easier to read;

Just a few ideas. Hope these help. Once you have done these, you might like to seek re-assessment. To do so, please add the article's name to the list of requests at WP:MHA. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. The article is much improved now, however, I feel it just needs a couple more citations. I've added the citations needed templates to where I think they are required. Once these are added, I would be more than happy to promote it to a B class article. Well done. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-assessed this article now after a number of changes have been made and feel that it is now up to B class standard. There is still one citation needed, however, I feel that it should not be held back from a B for want of one citation. If this could be added, though, that would be great. Well done. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

where's the citation needed? NtheP (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's been added in now. Well done. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]