Talk:9M119 Svir/Refleks

Say what?
Can somebody include a translation of the name(s)? TREKphiler  hit me ♠  09:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Citation
There is no citation for the armor penetration value given by the article. My sources say 700-750mm in RHAe, minus 50mm for conventional ERA. That is a big difference and a relevant one. The article is basically good but probably too arcane for layman. Jon Chin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.225.71.63 (talk) 12:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Svir vs Releks
Reflex was older and extremely costly (only used for T-80s) and thus they developed svir for T-72s which was much cheaper, lacked automization unit 9S517, target acqizition unit 9C536. Svir uses 1K13 "Neman", which has 4km range and does not allow to shoot while moving. I'd go so far as suggesting splitting article in two, weapons are related in function but that's it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.112.108.225 (talk) 09:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on 9M119. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222081223/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil:80/Red-Star/issues/OCT95/OCT95.HTML to http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/Red-Star/issues/OCT95/OCT95.HTML
 * Added tag to https://rdl.train.army.mil/soldierPortal/atia/adlsc/view/public/10877-1/fm/3-19.4/appendl.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)