Talk:AABB

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 18:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

American Association of Blood Banks → AABB — article was moved inappropriately to expand an acronym, but the name is no longer an acronym as explicitly cited in the article from the organization's own web page. It is now just a four letter name in capitals. The current location should obviously redirect to the correct location instead of being a disambiguation page. The article was formerly hatnoted for the other definition, which is an acronym. — Rogerb67 (talk) 01:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.



Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * There is now something else called AABB, so the original AABB would have to be called AABB (blood handling) or similar, or leave it as the full name, which is clearer than yet another acronym. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Since AABB is a two-item dab and the other thing is not officially named "AABB", would not the best solution be to move this article to its correct name and add a hat note? Otto4711 (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That's what it was until just recently. The key thing that isn't that obvious is that AABB (the organization) is just a wacky name, it's not an acronym anymore, and putting it at the expansion doesn't comply with naming requirements.  A little bit of poking around reveals that AABB is also an acronym for a Brazilian football club and a structure for musical composition (first theme, repeat, second theme, repeat, also not an acronym), so maybe AABB (foo) is a more appropriate location if and when those articles are written.  SDY (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support as nominator. Note that pretty much every other use of AABB is an acronym, where this is the proper name of an organization.  AABB (professional society) would be a good backup since AABB (organization) could nominally mean the Brazilian football club.  (blood handling) is inappropriate, since blood is not the entirety of the organization (hence the name change).  SDY (talk) 14:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think that the very fact it isn't an acronym means it should have the AABB name – such a rule could be open to abuse, changing the name of an existing, marginally notable organisation to CIA (not an acronym) for example. As there are no other articles with a similarly strong claim, it should in this case however. Incidentally, the Brazilian AABB I could find looks more like a bank's health club than a football club, but it's all in Portuguese, and i don't understand a word of it, so who knows. Either way there is no wiki article, so no naming conflict. --Rogerb67 (talk) 00:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on AABB. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110212110100/http://www.aabb.org/resources/publications/Pages/transfusion.aspx to http://www.aabb.org/resources/publications/Pages/transfusion.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)