Talk:AFP-L3

cleanup tags 1 and 2
Bob 15:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the writer of this article and a newbie to posting on Wikipedia. I'm curious what the editor's note, "his article needs to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of quality.", is intended to convey to me. I'd be happy to address any deficiencies present however, you must provide more concise criticism in order for me to fix it. Thanks
 * Hi, and welcome. I was basically just thinking of a somewhat more structured, and perhaps lengthened article. Also, I think that the references take up too much space compared to the length of the articl. I don't think that they should be removed, only made more compact. Also (if possible), perhaps some history as to the developement/discovery, and how it has been used over the years. Bjelleklang -  talk 16:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

I've added a cleanup-context tag to this article. This is because I had to read it several times to work out the subject matter of the article. A short introductory paragraph explaining that this is somethign to do with cancer tumors (if that is what it is) written to be understood by a lay-person who has arrived here via a random article link would be most useful. Thryduulf 15:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

cleanup tag 3
Article still needs cleanup. Wikify, link references to text, format references per MOS, remove promotional content. --Una Smith (talk) 23:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, the article largely omits tumors other than HCC. Expand the scope to all relevant tumor types. --Una Smith (talk) 00:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)