Talk:A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 19 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Isresnick.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance[edit]

Hi, I removed the internet comments in the main article because they did not seem to be notable. Leah 08:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Self-proclaimed"[edit]

I altered the term "self-proclaimed documentary" to "documentary," as the program is not classified as anything other than documentary on any network in any country. While some may find the content objectionable, "self-proclaimed" goes one step further and challenges the validity of the program's status as a documentary. In this light, I consider the phrase guilty of "weasel words" and removed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.232.154 (talk) 16:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brandi Belle?[edit]

Might just be me, but the actress for the nude scenes looks very similar to Brandi Belle, an internet porn star.. Anyone know if it's her or not? - NemFX (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of story summary?[edit]

Why was this revert done? It would be good to have more summaries of stories, if perhaps not in the lead section. The next one I'd like to include is where girls are told that all men secretly want larger penises -- three men who say they want larger penises are lined up naked, have their erect penises measured with a man with a ruler (5.5, 5.5, and 6.5 inches) in a game-show montage of music and graphics, go off with a penis pump and a stretching device for two months, and two of the three are said to gain a full inch of erect length. That reminds me, any talk of contracts between this show and sex toy manufacturers? I haven't seen the breast-enlargement episode, ~~or the episode on fellatio techniques,~~ or vaginal reconstruction and subsequent forgiveness and happy home life after a husband mutilates his wife. If they exist, perhaps someone else could summarize those stories. Blackworm (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No reliable sources and borders on trivial. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, is this article already at the standard where we delete anything that is not sourced reliably? I see absolutely no reliable sources in this article other than for the statements on the Ofcom bulletin. The IMDb link doesn't verify any statement. I will join you and delete all unsourced statements from the article. Blackworm (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The imdb link verifies:

The title
Dr Catherine Hood is the presenter
The episodes were broadcast in 2006
That the episodes were 45m long
That is was made in the UK
The cast and crew
The production company and channel
The subjects on the 8 episodes
That there were 8 episodes
The cast for each episode

However it does not confirm any individual story. And the ofcom pdf (page 13) confirms the ofcom section. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject banners[edit]

I have removed the banner for {{WPMED}} again and ask that you not replace it on this article about a television show. WikiProject Medicine does not, as a rule, consider articles about television shows to be within its scope, even when the shows contain some information about medical conditions or human anatomy. I have also added the banner for the WikiProject that is dedicated to British TV shows, because presumably they would be interested in this article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode Listing[edit]

I've constructed a chart showing the contents of each episode as well as the original ir date for each. Sdsures (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]