Talk:A Letter to a Young Poet

Untitled
The information included is certainly relevant, however, it is not detailed enough to give the reader a good understanding of what the book is about or its origins. The details need to be elaborated on and information could be structured in a more clear way. The language can also be changed. There are spots where most of the information included is in the form of quotes that are not explained or explored. This also presents a more narrow interpretation of the work as a whole, after establishing that Woolfe attempted to cover a variety of topics. These topics should also be elaborated on in their own sections or paragraphs.

The article is neutral.

The reception section focuses heavily on the response of one person. This response is relevant, as it is the response of someone credited with helping inspire the text, but other responses are not considered in any kind of detail or nuance.

More sources could definitely help elaborate on the reception of the book and I do not think the letter that inspired the text itself is referenced, which it should be. The sources that are used seem to be well cited and trustworthy.

This is a C-Class article in the interest group of women writers. There did not seem to be much activity on the talk page at all despite its Mid-importance rating. Kcowherd (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)