Talk:A Little Boy Lost

This is atrociously written, and almost incomprehensible in places. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.178.203 (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

"The main point Blake was trying to make was..."---say what??
(What a fortituous and happy circumstance for ol'-struggling-with-words-Willie Blake that, some 300 years on, he has the aid of Wp editors to explain what he was trying to say.)

I find it to be very difficult to understand the existing article narrative; it is not accurate in its broad observations, nor is it convincing in its logic. Re sourced material, it typically is not clear whether the text is the critic's voice or that of the editor. It is presumptuous---in the editor's corrective of Blake's insufficiency for making poetry (see title-line above). Then it rambles into meaningless detail about the graphic (ie, " ..the photo above..."). //// I say dispense with it; let's start over---and welcome to any one who can help with developing or improving this page.Jbeans (talk) 14:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC)