Talk:A Tenured Professor

Irrelevant section?
I don't think the "Read on" bit is irrelevant. I'm taking the liberty to put it back. Any comments on my talk page or here, please. &lt;K F&gt;  11:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree it isn't irrelevant - however it might fit better in a larger article that extends beyond a plot summary, if more can be found on the piece it might be nice to at it. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  11:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Are "Read on" sections a typical and accepted practice within novel articles? Reaper Man (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Tenured Professor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071219195947/http://www.prof2000.pt/users/afp/economia/eco01/02eco01a.htm to http://www.prof2000.pt/users/afp/economia/eco01/02eco01a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)