Talk:Aamir Khan/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 18:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

I will put up the comments in a short while! Numerounovedant  Talk  18:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Suggest Peer Review and Re-nomination
 * There are numerous issues with this article and I suggest a Peer Review, as substantial work is required in the article!
 * Lead
 * There are issues with the quality of prose, use of noun and pronouns and basic structural issues.
 * Lead should lose all the references and they should be incorporated into the prose.


 * Early Life
 * Quality issues with prose-

"Khan" has been overused, no or rare pronouns have been incorporated.
 * "Khan's parents opposed to his joining films due to their own experiences, wishing that he would instead pursue a "steady" career of an engineer or doctor" - awkward phrasing.


 * Career
 * Refrences throughout the article are missing at crucial points and cluttered in places. The former is the case with the whole career section. Movie like Raja Hindustani, and Ishq among others have no refrences.


 * Quality of prose is sub-par.


 * Film Production and direction
 * Poorly sourced, evident from the first paragraph itself.


 * In the media
 * The entire first paragraph is unsourced.
 * Quality issues.
 * "On intolerance" - Needs a lot of work, cleanup, trimming and re-phrasing.


 * Haven't even gone through the refrences yet, but chechlinks shows 5 dead links, too many format issues, broken links, and error plague the article.  Numerounovedant   Talk  18:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

This article honestly needs a lot if work and because if it's size I suggest a WP:PR for it. Waiting for the response, but the article is nowhere near WP:GA standard. Numerounovedant  Talk  18:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Final Comments


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: