Talk:Abort67

Bias in Article
The article as it currently stands is consistently biased in favour of Abort67's views and actions.

It's worth noting that the majority of this article was written by an account named "Abort67", suggesting that they have written their own article. Havell (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Response to claims of bias from Abort67
When the article was written by someone who wasn't from Abort67 (and therefore unaware of what we are about) it was biased against us - using pro-abortion leaning media to support claims. If we were dishonest then we could have used a pseudonym. The fact that we dispute the allegations and have backed it up with documented evidence (court case) removes the plausibility of your "bias" claim. If you disagree still, then please be more specific about which points you believe to be bias as opposed to irrefutably vague comments.