Talk:Acoustic location

Seismic
Dont think the section on seismics belongs here. 88.105.188.93 14:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Natural vs technological
This article manages to completely avoid mentioning its very close relative: sound localization. That one is about the natural methods, this one about amplifying natural methods using technology. Not good! The only brush with that other article in this one is the tiny section entitled "Biological echo location", including not even a link to the main article. The topics should both refer to each other, at least. I do not think they should be merged but they could be to cover the subject in a very complete manner. Binksternet (talk) 18:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

is this paragraph correct?
Microphones used with these devices enable active localization while speakers enable passive localization.

On tablet so hard to edit, but have read that sentence a few times, and seems inverted. A reciever/microphone would be used for passive (and active) while a transmitter/speaker would be used for active. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.115.208 (talk) 04:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Merge
It seems that acoustic source localization equals passive acoustic location. fgnievinski (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acoustic location. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090502154225/http://www.doramusic.com/soundmirrors.htm to http://www.doramusic.com/soundmirrors.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acoustic location. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327023713/http://www.foi.se/fusion/fusion20.pdf to http://www.foi.se/fusion/fusion20.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Ecotracer
There was a section in this article titled "Ecotracer", which was a merge from Ecotracer. Its only reference was to one now-defunct hobbyist page. That page did not use the term "ecotracer", and I can't find any references that support it except Wikipedia-sourced cruft, so I think this is citogenesis. Some of the text was also a copyvio from the hobbyist page, and what wasn't seems redundant to the military use info elsewhere in the article, so I'm just removing the whole section. William Pietri (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Interwiki cleanup?
Apparently many interwikis, having echo- in them, discuss only active ranging, but not old-school passive sound location. Perhaps, splitting wikidata bundle into two? Retired electrician (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * purely passive stuff is under d:Q1584129) heading (no en: entry - ?). Retired electrician (talk) 19:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Faulty text
The text: ”A single active sonar can localize in range and bearing as well as measuring radial speed. However, a single passive sonar can only localize in bearing directly” ….is not true. One single passive sonar can also solve for range as well as bearing. 90.229.210.161 (talk) 20:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)