Talk:Adam Foulds

Notability
I found it extraordinary that a page, clearly referenced, on a published author who is the winner of one award and current contender for another award, both of which are notable enough to have their own WP pages, should have been marked for deletion.  almost - instinct 09:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

This was precisely my rationale for adding this person, so thank you, almost-instinct. As the media coverage cited in the article makes clear, Foulds is in fact a very notable literary talent, and the page was created to reflect the continuing interest of prize judges in his writings. It seems extraordinary to me that it was marked for deletion. Macphysto (talk) 10:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Foulds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100305070326/http://www.rslit.org/content/fellows to http://www.rslit.org/content/fellows

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)