Talk:Ademar José Gevaerd

Reliability of sources
There are a lot of very unreliable sources in this article, that even a non-Portuguese speaker can recognise. PRWeb, a self-published (on an Australian ISP user's webpage) journal, etc, etc. I would suggest that anybody assessing this article take a good hard look at each source, use Google Translate if necessary, and decide for themselves if they're reliable. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Unreliable source, possible intent to demean
The reference #14 is unreliable and the entire paragraph that preceded it was clearly an attempt to demean the biographee, and was removed (paragraph and reference only). The biographee (Gevaerd) has been alerted about that and it is suspected that this bit was added by the person who owns the "source" that is mentioned in reference #14 (pepe chaves). The facts had been reversed: Gevaerd does not even know Nuno Alves personally, and neither has "attacked" anyone -- the "source" is in fact, a disgruntled ex-employee of UFO magazine deemed mentally unstable, who did indeed attack the biographee as an act of revenge, which resulted in the biographee filing a police report against the "source".

Please be aware of a possible "edit warring situation". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.209.198.85 (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)