Talk:Administrative law in Ukraine

Close paraphrasing
Unless we are able to determine that the source is public domain or compatibly licensed, this article will need to be rewritten, as it is far too closely paraphrased. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following: The source says:

The article says:

The source says:

The article says:

The rest of the first section closely follows content furhter down.

So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this content should be rewritten in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution. (See Plagiarism.)

Please let me know at my talk page if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.law-property.in.ua/articles/29-administrative-law-of-ukraine-as-a-branch-of-law-a-science-and-a-discipline.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The material from: http://www.law-property.in.ua/articles/29-administrative-law-of-ukraine-as-a-branch-of-law-a-science-and-a-discipline.html is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.111.165.248 (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)