Talk:Advanced Tactical Laser

Laser power and class error
This article states: The laser will be a 100 kilowatt-class chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL). It is expected to have a tactical range of approximately twenty kilometers and weigh about 5,000–7,000 kg. This program is distinct from the Airborne Laser, which is a much larger system designed to destroy enemy missiles in the boost phase.

I understand that the 100 kw laser is solid state and is much lighter. It is not a COIL system. The Airborne Laser is a megawatt system and uses COIL. Please verify and correct this article. See: http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=184609 http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=184242 Figlinus (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Image caption
Currently, the image caption says "AC-130 with Advanced Tactical Laser onboard" or something like that; yet, there is no concrete mention anywhere else of an AC-130 gunship mounting the weapon--only that the ATL was mounted on a C-130. Unless the addition of the weapon automatically changes the C-130 to an AC-130, the image caption should be changed to match the picture's description, which does in fact say "C-130." — Preceding unsigned comment added by The paccagnellan (talk • contribs) 00:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Advanced Tactical Laser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090621004746/http://www.af.mil:80/news/story.asp?id=123154924 to http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123154924
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061023001717/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q4/061012b_nr.html to http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q4/061012b_nr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)