Talk:Affair of Néry

Untitled
Also present per Baker: Warwickshire, Royal Welsh Fusiliers, Cameronians, Middlesex, Argylls, Royal Dublin Fusiliers. Per Edmonds, the relief was a composite bn of 1 Warwicks & 2nd Dublins from 10th Brigade, then the 1/Middlesex from 19 Brigade. Other three regiments were the remainder of 19th Brigade, not mentioned by Edmonds. I Battery RHA present, plus 4th Cavalry - so Household Composite Regiment, 6th Dragoon Guards, 3rd Hussars.

http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/28976/pages/9374 Dorrell and Nelson citations]; Bradbury citation

Possible map

German losses still unknown 96 years later?
This battle took place almost 96 years ago. The Germans certainly would have known what their losses werem and this information should have become part of the public record worldwide when the German histories of the war were written in the 1920s. Surely there must be at least one English historian or researcher who has that information by now.

I'm not criticizing the entry as written but rather asking if someone who specializes in this particular area of military history can add the information that is currently missing. (71.22.47.232 (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC))


 * Edmonds was pretty scrupulous about incorporating the German records where available, but his footnote suggests that there hadn't been anything published in the first few years - he quotes various people involved who'd published memoirs, but no casualty figures beyond vague ones. There's a recent work which I'm currently chasing up, which apparently contains a bit more information. Thanks for spotting this - "unknown" should have been more of a red flag to me!
 * Details may be quite sketchy even so, however; the division was scattered for several days and didn't reoccupy the ground of the fighting, meaning that it would be very hard at the time to identify who was killed versus who was just a straggler (of which there were no doubt many). Shimgray | talk | 13:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Action at Néry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://home.comcast.net/~jcviser/index.htm/army/OBx.htm
 * Added tag to http://freespace.virgin.net/howard.anderson/monsretreat.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718095416/http://www.chakoten.dk/cgi-bin/fm.cgi?n=795 to http://www.chakoten.dk/cgi-bin/fm.cgi?n=795
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718095547/http://www.chakoten.dk/cgi-bin/fm.cgi?n=797 to http://www.chakoten.dk/cgi-bin/fm.cgi?n=797

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Affair, Action or Battle?
Although the article describes this engagement as "a skirmish" which might be a fair assessment of it, I note that the article was once called 'Action at Nery', while it is now 'Affair of Nery' (I can't type acutes or graves). This seems an odd choice of title. The National Army Museum actually calls this engagement "the Battle of Nery" so is pretty happy with that and does not seem content to rely on an archaic (and somewhat dismissive-sounding) classification such as 'affair'.

https://collection.nam.ac.uk/detail.php?acc=1993-09-86-1

But, as I tend to get chided as though I were a minor whenever I put forth a case for anything on WP these days, I'll just leave it at that and walk away. Do as thou must and good tidings to you all. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:4C3D:AA4:757B:D575 (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)