Talk:Age of Anger

Edit/Rv in reception section
I reverted your edit for three reasons I outlined in my edit summary. When you re-did the edit, I saw only one of the three addressed in your summary. Your edit still created a sentence fragment with stray markup in the article, and it still left some of the Slate stuff in, while removing things that didn't come from Slate. Both of these seem like mistakes even if Slate is not reliable. Furthermore, Slate *is* a reliable source according to WP:RSN, as I stated. A source's reliability is not determined by sitejabber, yelp, or any other place online; it is determined by on-wiki consensus using a variety of different types of evidence. In my edit summary, citing RSN was referencing that consensus.--MattMauler (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)