Talk:Agnes Denes

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Agnes Denes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620125107/http://agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS6.html to http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS6.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620125127/http://agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS7.html to http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS7.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620125137/http://agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS8.html to http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS8.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620124931/http://agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS8B.html to http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS8B.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509081808/http://www.marquette.edu/haggerty/press/denespress.html to http://www.marquette.edu/haggerty/press/denespress.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130803215621/http://agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKSAustraliaForest.html to http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKSAustraliaForest.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131006100459/http://agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKSNWP.html to http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKSNWP.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620124926/http://agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS4.html to http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/WORKS4.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117172405/http://arts.mit.edu/va/roster/ to http://arts.mit.edu/va/roster/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Citation 2 Irrelevant?
The article linked to in citation 2 seems, although about Agnes Denes in general, to bear no relation to the actual statement on the page is seems to be meant to corroborate. Can who(m)ever is responsible for this either amend or point out its relation? HectorHawkins (talk) 23:57, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * do you mean the New York Times profile? It matches perfectly with the claims in the lede, but perhaps you meant another use in the article?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)