Talk:Agnosphitys

Views on Agnosphitys
Although Fraser et. al. (2002) view Agnosphitys as a non-dinosaurian dinosauriform, Langer (2004) considers this genus a nomen dubium, due to the ongoing debate as to whether Agnosphitys is a dinosaur or not. Mortimer (2006, online) found Agnosphitys to be a theropod, supporting the hypothesis that Agnosphitys is a dinosaur. (His analysis also recovers Chindesaurus and Guaibasaurus as also basal theropods.) For this reason, do you need to update this page.

1. M. C. Langer. 2004. Basal Saurischia. In D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, & H. Osmólska (eds.), The Dinosauria (second edition). University of California Press, Berkeley 25-46.

2. http://staff.washington.edu/eoraptor/Phylogeny%20of%20Taxa.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.194.116.63 (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC).