Talk:Agnostida

Agnostids weren't cannibals
The hypothesis that Agnostids were cannibals did not appear in the peer reviewed literature. It was a talk at the anual GSA meeting. Talks at GSA don't go through any peer review process. Basically the idea is completely batshit insane. It doesn't deserve to be on the wikipedia page.

Systematic Position of Agnostids
I think that it is wise not to place whether agnostids are trilobites or crustaceomorphs in the heading of the article, and instead deal with the controversy in the text.

Size
What is the size range of these beasties? Also how many thoracic segements, typically? Stub Mandrel (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Agnostida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040407030239/http://www.aloha.net:80/%7Esmgon/ordagnostida.htm to http://www.aloha.net/~smgon/ordagnostida.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)