Talk:Agricultural Bank of China robbery

[Untitled]
Chinese script should be added for the names of the perpetrators as well as what the robbery was called in the media. Rigadoun (talk) 00:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Agricultural Bank of China robbery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184847/http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article2851433.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article2851433.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Embezzlement is not robbery
Embezzlement is not robbery, rather it is fraud or theft. Robbery requires the use of force, or threat of its use, to effect the taking of money or other property. In other words, it involves committing an assault in order to committing theft. The sources are not precise nor consistent about describing what crime has been committed, as they also say this was a theft or an embezzelment. Then again, reporters are not lawyers, nor are they police officers, so we cannot expect them to understand the different definitions of robbery and theft, and they appear to be using these criminal terms very loosely and vaguely. The absence of violence means this article should be called a theft, or fraud, not a robbery. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)