Talk:Alabama's at-large congressional district

Discrepancy
In United States Congressional Delegations from Alabama, the only congress that is indicated as having the delegation elected At-large is the 88th.--Appraiser 22:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I've corrected that now. —Markles 10:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't there be an * on 43rd, 44th, 63rd, and 64th? How about changes to the ordinal congresses?  The 88th has A/L for the Alabama delegation, whereas the 43rd, 44th, etc. have district numbers.--Appraiser 13:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * On the 43, 44, 63, 64 only one seat was At-large. I've abondoned "*"s on the delegation articles when I've instead been able to note clearly that the seat was at-large.  As for the ordinal congresses, those need to be changed.  My source for the delegation article is Martis, which I trust. —Markles 13:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * OK; is the table in General ticket now accurate and complete, so I can use it to correct the ordinals and delegation articles?--Appraiser 15:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no idea. I did very little work on the current version.—Markles 16:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alabama's at-large congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)