Talk:Albarracín

Merge
I'm against the proposed merge, the taifa is a historical entity clearly different from the modern town. --Jotamar (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I am also against.--Morisco (talk) 02:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no way this should be deleted. The early Christian kingdoms and many of the Muslim ones are well chronicled on this site, there is no reason that this kingdom should not be. Definitely could use more research though because it is out there. -Clark Sui (talk) 08:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Albarracín. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090311233825/http://www.ine.es/intercensal/index to http://www.ine.es/intercensal/index
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813054947/http://www.ine.es/inebase2/leer.jsp?L=0&divi=DPOP&his=0 to http://www.ine.es/inebase2/leer.jsp?L=0&divi=DPOP&his=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)