Talk:Aliʻi nui of Maui

The whole concept of alii aimoku-ship is a joke made by Christopher Buyer on his royal ark cite which are riddled in errors. There was never a first or second king of Maui and etc.. The chiefs of this line never controlled the entire island of Maui. The chiefs of eastern Maui were independent and even legends and oral traditions don't speak of any overlordship of this line until the reign of King Piilani. This is a problem that has been addressed to me by a few Hawaiians and reinforced by my own doubts. The title moi is thought to be a later invention by Hawaiians and alii aimoku actually could refer to a district chief since moku means both district and island in Hawaii. In the process of creating articles for these chiefs, please don't focus in on these points, but rather write about their own personal exploits and family and posterities.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The term Alii nui is the correct title. it can refer to the supreme ruler of an island as well as the chief with the largest land ownership such as Liloa who was really only a district chief with the largest amount of land. His son Umi would unify the island and become the supreme ruler as a true alii nui.--Mark Miller (talk) 07:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)