Talk:All We Know Is Falling

Fair use rationale for Image:Awkif.jpg
Image:Awkif.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Proper title?
Should it be "All We Know is Falling", versus "Is"? Fantasy Dragon (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on All We Know Is Falling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140205035631/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesALBUMaccreds2012.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesALBUMaccreds2012.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

charts problem
There seems to problem(s) with the charts placings. Billboard Comprehensive Albums article says it "ranked the biggest selling albums in the United States regardless of the product's age or method of sales", and Top Pop Catalog Albums says "Billboard defines a catalog title as one that is more than 18 months old".

As it seems, "Commercial performance" section has different years: Heatseekers in September 2006 and Pop Catalog Albums in 2007. There's no mention of the Comprehensive Albums charting year/date, and it is impossible to have been #2, as on its best week there were 12 more-selling albums just in the catalog chart and Billboard 200 most certainly had more. 85.76.47.149 (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The nominator has yet to address those issue.
 * Greeeaaat...  danny music editor  Speak up! 23:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think this is Billboards problem and not ours. I can note this, but it should look less technical and easier to understand to the average reader - I had trouble understanding what you meant at first. So, how should I write that...  danny music editor ' Speak up! 03:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have removed the problematic Comprehensive albums chart, and the second one you mentioned was simply misplaced; it belonged in the 2009 slot.  danny music editor  Speak up! 20:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)