Talk:Alliance for Shared Values

Removal
I've removed a bit that was poorly sourced innuendo. As far as I can see, no mainstream or otherwise reliable publication has published anything on the subject (probably because "There is no there there"), and there are BLP considerations here. Until there is verification by some other, reliable sources, and some showing of significance, I've removed this. Neutralitytalk 01:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That's very fair, User:Neutrality, I was uncertain myself if it had any place in it. That's also why I stressed that it was "according to X". The only reason I found it notable is because the Daily Sabah had an article it. I have nothing against the deletion whatsoever. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 11:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)