Talk:Alternative hypothesis

Untitled
This article needs to be renamed to "Alternative hypothesis", as "alternate" is the wrong word. Melcombe (talk) 16:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

✅ Done Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support as common usage. I do not believe this is an Anglo-American problem. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * In my experience alternative is more common, probably in part due to lowers ambiguity outside America. Knepflerle (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "Alternative" is about 9 times more common:
 * 369 articles with "alternative hypothesis"
 * 40 articles with "alternate hypothesis"
 * It is also more correct. Thunderbird2 (talk) 18:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2021 and 19 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Leolsz. Peer reviewers: Hanshenli, 0.25cm, Shg7D1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Inappropriate image


This image appears in the article, but it seems to be not relevant to this context of hypothesis testing. There is no hypothesis, and there is no data set other than the single data point of this one container. So I'm going to delete the image. Loraof (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Potentially wrong example
I think that the null hypothesis in the example is not complete. It states "there is no change in quality between the first and second halves of the data" and the alternative is "the quality is poorer in the second half of the record". What if the quality turns out to be better? Shouldn't the null specify something like "Quality 2 ⩾ Quality 1" since the alternative is "Quality 2 < Quality 1"?