Talk:Alternative purchase network

Tone
This article is written more as an editorial than a Wikipedia article, more intended to persuade than inform. The article also talks about the benefits of doing something, not at a general level as would be expected of wikipedia, but at a personal level, as would be expected of a magazine.

These are just two lines, but the majority of the article is like this: -   "but also to disadvantaged groups who can’t use the traditional market channels (mainly regarding second-hand shops and ethical finance)" -   "Fair trade market is an interesting example"

Way too many pointless edits were required to add that, sorry Wikipedia servers.

Uzantonomo (talk) 13:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)