Talk:American Horror Story/GA1
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
There's no reason this should still need a review so I'll give it a shot. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found:
- There's quite a few disambiguation pages that need fixing: see here.
- What's confusing to me is that season 1 and season 2 read pretty much opposite. Season 1's just a plot summary while season 2's just about the cast and modifications. I understand why, but will the season 2 section change upon that season airing? The season 2 stuff is all mentioned in casting anyway, so that can really just be cut entirely since right now there's a big duplicated section.
- "He will be playing a "contemporary character and half of a couple known only as 'The Lovers'", according to Tim Stack of Entertainment Weekly." quote needs a citation.
- "The show's producers will be accommodating Levine's busy summer schedule.[11]" we don't really need modifiers like busy added in.
- Paras two and three of conception can be combined.
- "FX has submitted the series to th" That FX can be delinked.
- "drew rankings of 1st or 2nd " first or second.
- Web references without access dates need them added.
I'll put the article on hold for five days and will check back to see if the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- I fixed all the issues except the access dates for the references. They require more time than I currently have. Anyone wish to help? — WylieCoyote (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Tried doing it myself but based on how the refs are set up adding them is difficult. I'll wait a couple days but it's minor enough that I may pass it anyway; the access dates are more to show the links work, which I already checked with a tool. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 00:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- On second thought, it's a really minor issue, so I'm just going to pass the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Tried doing it myself but based on how the refs are set up adding them is difficult. I'll wait a couple days but it's minor enough that I may pass it anyway; the access dates are more to show the links work, which I already checked with a tool. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 00:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.