Talk:American Rescue Plan Act of 2021/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Peer review

I have did a peer review for this article. Feel free to let me know on the peer review page what you think. --AmericanRescuePlan2021 (talk) 02:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

"Justice for Black Farmers Act" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Justice for Black Farmers Act. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 11#Justice for Black Farmers Act until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 19 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)



American Rescue PlanAmerican Rescue Plan Act of 2021 – House Democrats released the full text of their $1.9 Covid-19 relief bill, which states "This Act may be cited as the 'American Rescue Plan Act of 2021'"[1]

References

Phillip Samuel (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Comment Hi Phillip Samuel, if American Rescue Plan is going to be merged to American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, then shouldn’t the peer review should also be merged? —AmericanRescuePlan2021 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure, I'm not an expert when it comes to peer reviews. Phillip Samuel (talk) 02:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2021

In infobox, state that the bill passed the Senate "with amendments". This is standard practice for all U.S. legislation passed by one house of Congress and amended by another. 138.51.116.163 (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

No actual edit requested, so I'm closing this request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2021

I request that this information goes in the article: As Biden was getting ready to sign the bill, the Dow and Roblox stocks increased. [4] ARP2021 (talk) 22:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: It's probably entirely coincidental and not relevant. For other things which might be correlated but not be the cause of one another, see this - which is what the article seems to imply, i.e. "The Dow Jones Industrial Average hit a new record high on encouraging new data, while President Joe Biden is getting set to sign the Covid stimulus bill. " - "while" is a temporal, not causal, link. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2021

I would include this sentence in the “Public opinion” section: A poll released by CBS News showed that 75% of Americans approved the stimulus bill, including 77% of independents, 46% of Republicans, and 94% of Democrats. [5] ARP2021 (talk) 04:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done Slightly reworded beginning of the sentence to avoid repetition within the paragraph. Caius G. (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2021

I request that this template is added to the external links tab: {{Template:Wikinews-inline|US President Biden signs US$1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package}} ARP2021 (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Volteer1 (talk) 07:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)