Talk:Amy Chow

Hall of Fame years
The article currently says she received her individual induction into the hall of fame in 1984, which the cited source backs up. However, she didn't start competing nationally until 1990. I believe it was 1994 in recognition of the championship at Dortmund. Contradicting the hall itself, though, is a bit awkward, even if it is just a typo on their site. Does anyone have a different source, or do we include a note saying the hall is wrong, or what? Beginning (talk) 20:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * As the editor who added that, I agree it's an error. 1984 does not make sense.  usa-gymnastics.org lists the 1996 Women’s Olympic Team (inducted 1998) as the correct date.  This is the only team listed that Chow participated in.  Note: usa-gymnastics.org is the official site (but very sparse), and gymnasticshalloffame.org is an unofficial site produced by a HOF enthusiast,  that I think is ordinarily a reliable source, but in a case of conflict such as this one, must bow to the official site. I will update this later if no one beats me to it. TJRC (talk) 00:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)


 * It's now updated. TJRC (talk) 04:00, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

M.D.
I have a question, seeing as Amy is now a fully qualified medical doctor shouldn't she carry an "M.D." after her surname. This is something that all doctors are intitled to once they finish their training. Just a thought? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.87.90 (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * No; see WP:CREDENTIAL. TJRC (talk) 00:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 09:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)